Press Release
Embargoeduntil 00:01hrs
Monday 14 July2003
Business still under pressure, says IoD
Ruth Lea, Head of thePolicy Unit at the IoD, said:
"The latestBusiness Opinion Survey shows a business sector under pressure. Even thoughthere are modest improvements compared with Marchs survey they can probably beattributed to post-war relief that the Iraq war was quick and oil supplies wereuninterrupted. All the major indicators of economic and business activityremain relatively weak. And this is especially true of manufacturing. There isno indication in these figures that there will be a return to strong economicgrowth. "
![]() |
/2
/2
The survey foundthat:
Company performanceappeared to improve in June but was still weak. Even though the majority ofrespondents reported their companies were still performing well, the balance ofthose companies performing well, minus those performing badly, was just 56 percent in June 2003 compared with 72 per cent in December 2001 and 80 per cent inJune 2001. Performance in the manufacturing sector actually deteriorated and,showing a balance of 39 per cent, was the worst since the current surveystarted in 1996.
Business optimism didappear to bounce back in June but this statistic relates to the balance ofcompanies that were more, rather than less, optimistic about their companysprospects relative to the previous quarter. And the previous quarter wasundoubtedly clouded by events in Iraq.
The results oncapacity utilisation, order books, employment growth, output growth, profitsand investment were, on balance, better, but still weak compared with previousyears. The manufacturing sector continued to return particularly worryingresponses.
Price pressuresremained weak, with many more respondents reporting increased costs (a balanceof 33 per cent) than increased prices (a balance of -3%) - putting a squeeze onmargins. Average pay settlements were around a modest 3.3 per cent in June,similar to Marchs 3.2 per cent.
Ruth Lea, said:
"There aresimply too many negative factors around not least of all the weak globaleconomy. The US economy remains seriously unbalanced, but through sheer energyand drive will eventually recover. This cannot be said about Germanys weaknessand there have to be doubts about the economic robustness of the other majorEuropean economies.
"Meanwhile,domestically, the Government persists in hampering business with more taxes andred tape despite increasing evidence that this pernicious combination destroysenterprise, wealth creation and job creation. In addition consumer spending andthe housing market, which have underpinned growth in recent quarters, areweakening."
Ends 10.7.03 No.183
/3
/3
Notes to Editors
1. The main results of the Business Opinion Surveys since 2000Q1 are attached. For a full copy of the latest Survey contact the Press Officeon 020 7451 3264.
2. The IoD (Institute of Directors) is a non-party politicalindependent organisation with around 55,000 members. In addition to its widerange of business services, the IoD provides an effective voice to representthe interests of its members to government and key opinion-formers. It alsobrings he experience of business leaders to bear on the conduct of publicaffairs.
Contact Points:
Ruth Lea, Head of thePolicy Unit, tel: 020 7451 3291
Graeme Leach, ChiefEconomist, tel: 020 7451 3366
Richard Taylor, PressOfficer, tel: 020 7451 3264
mobile and out of hours: 07721 734886
David Marshall,Director of Public Affairs, tel: 020 7451 3263
mobile and outof hours: 0776 4883420
web: www.iod.com
/4
/4
The main results of Business Opinion Surveys since 2000first quarter are shown in the table below (all the data related to balancesexpect for pay settlements which relate to an average):
|
|
00 Q3 |
00 Q4 |
01 Q1
|
01 Q2 |
01 Q3 |
01 Q4 |
02 Q1 |
02 Q2 |
02 Q3 |
02 Q4 |
03 Q1 |
03 Q2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company performance |
76 |
75 |
78 |
80 |
76 |
72 |
67 |
61 |
62 |
60 |
53 |
56 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
70 |
59 |
72 |
72 |
76 |
63 |
58 |
51 |
58 |
58 |
57 |
39 |
|
Optimism |
39 |
35 |
28 |
28 |
23 |
10 |
40 |
23 |
27 |
15 |
-6 |
23 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
38 |
22 |
3 |
19 |
16 |
12 |
32 |
12 |
28 |
22 |
-25 |
15 |
|
Capacity utilisation |
-8 |
-6 |
-13 |
-22 |
-7 |
-21 |
-29 |
-25 |
-21 |
-18 |
-27 |
-28 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
-27 |
-31 |
-18 |
-42 |
-4 |
-34 |
-39 |
-39 |
-14 |
-17 |
-37 |
-30 |
|
Order books (total) |
24 |
27 |
20 |
9 |
11 |
6 |
7 |
-2 |
-6 |
2 |
-18 |
-11 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
22 |
20 |
16 |
-10 |
6 |
-1 |
-4 |
-1 |
-7 |
1 |
-21 |
-14 |
|
Export order books |
2 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
-1 |
-17 |
4 |
-2 |
10 |
-2 |
-4 |
-1 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
5 |
-11 |
6 |
-20 |
-21 |
-26 |
3 |
-8 |
4 |
2 |
-8 |
-13 |
|
Employment (reported) |
22 |
25 |
22 |
18 |
28 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
4 |
12 |
1 |
7 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
26 |
12 |
5 |
-7 |
18 |
-2 |
-2 |
-3 |
-10 |
14 |
-9 |
-1 |
|
Output (reported) |
41 |
43 |
40 |
40 |
38 |
33 |
36 |
29 |
24 |
30 |
15 |
20 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
39 |
43 |
24 |
25 |
31 |
20 |
28 |
24 |
31 |
41 |
11 |
16 |
|
Costs (reported) |
36 |
38 |
35 |
31 |
26 |
14 |
23 |
19 |
19 |
28 |
31 |
33 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
35 |
48 |
31 |
18 |
21 |
2 |
26 |
16 |
19 |
27 |
50 |
40 |
|
Prices (reported) |
7 |
8 |
9 |
8 |
2 |
-1 |
4 |
-5 |
-1 |
1 |
-3 |
-3 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
-3 |
-5 |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
-19 |
-5 |
-21 |
-23 |
-3 |
-21 |
-20 |
|
Profits (reported) |
19 |
18 |
23 |
17 |
21 |
13 |
9 |
9 |
7 |
9 |
-9 |
6 |
|
- of which manufacturing |
17 |
6 |
14 |
8 |
19 |
6 |
-8 |
5 |
8 |
15 |
-14 |
-9 |
|
Pay (%) |
4.1 |
4.6 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.6 |
4.0 |
3.6 |
3.9 |
4.3 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
|
Investment outlook* |
Na |
Na |
Na |
Na |
Na |
Na |
Na |
12 |
2 |
-1 |
-28 |
3 |
|
- of which manufacturing* |
Na |
Na |
Na |
Na |
Na |
Na |
Na |
7 |
1 |
2 |
-38 |
1 |
* aggregate seriesonly available from 2002Q2