Government must listen to local people if planning is to be democratic

8 June 2009

If planning is to be democratic the Government must listen, and respond to, the concerns of local people. This is the view of the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) as the Government prepares to publish a plan setting out the future for the South West region shortly. An earlier draft of the plan attracted a record 35,000 responses.

Georgie Bigg, CPRE Trustee and South West resident said:

'Plans for each of the English regions are meant to set out levels of development that are achievable and will not cause environmental damage. However, it increasingly seems that the Government are using them to deliver massive numbers of new homes with little regard for the impact that development will have on the quality and character of the countryside.

'In the case of the South West, more than 117,000 new homes are proposed for the Bristol and Bath area alone and over 33,000 of those are expected to be on Green Belt land.'

'The green spaces of the South West are important to those who live and work there, as well as being a big tourist attraction. They need to be protected from development. In the original draft plan the housing target for the region was around 23,000 new houses a year. The Government has most recently proposed to increase this to over 29,000 a year. They need to listen to the concerns of the people living and working in the region and rethink this unrealistic and unsustainable target.'

Georgie concluded:

'CPRE agrees that the South West region needs new homes, especially affordable ones, but the current plan does not take the right approach. The Government must show they are listening to the people that will be affected by this plan and significantly scale-back house building levels.'

CPRE is working as part of a coalition in the South West to encourage people to write to the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government to demand changes to the plan before it is finalised.

---

Press releases, papers and documents published on this page are the intellectual property of an organisation unrelated to ePolitix.com. We promote their parliamentary and political campaigning activities as they are subscribers to the ePolitix.com service.

As such, ePolitix.com does not edit, endorse, or attempt to balance the opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases and other such types of content are the responsibility of the originating organisation.