The Live Wire



Press Release

Which? puts eye testers to the test

30 August 2007

Almost half of eye examinations are poor or very poor quality according to the latest undercover research by Which?*

The consumer organisation sent optometry students into 39 eye-testing practices and found mixed results in quality, accuracy and thoroughness:

> 17 out of 39 examinations were considered to be poor or very poor – mainly due to missing essential tests**

> Seven out of 36 prescriptions were inaccurate - and some could have caused headaches and blurred vision

> 27 examinations failed to check how well the eye muscles work together

> Ten optometrists failed to ask whether the patient had experienced headaches and six failed to ask about family history

> 14 examinations took less than 20 minutes – the time experts say is needed for a thorough test***. The two shortest lasted just ten minutes.

Just one national chain’s practice and one independent optometrist were awarded top marks for tests carried out****.

National and regional chains fared no better than independent practices, although national chains charged on average £18.80 for a standard eye test, compared to £21.50 for independents and £24.80 at regional chains. There was no link between price and quality.

Neil Fowler, Editor, Which?, says:

“Good quality eye tests are vital for good health, so it’s really worrying that we found such inconsistent standards in our research. We want the General Optical Council to carry out spot checks of eye tests, to stop peoples’ health being put at risk.

“Eye tests are complex, so it can be hard to know whether you’re getting a decent quality of service. Ask how long an exam will take – if you’re told less than 20 minutes, or less than 30 minutes if you’re older or at more risk of eye problems, then go elsewhere.”



Press releases, papers and documents published on this page are the intellectual property of an organisation unrelated to Central Lobby. We promote their parliamentary and political campaigning activities as they are subscribers to the Central Lobby service.

As such, Central Lobby does not edit, endorse, or attempt to balance the opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases and other such types of content are the responsibility of the originating organisation.

Which?

Which?

More from Dods

© Dods Parliamentary Communications Ltd