The Live Wire



Press Release

Risk of less choice for students

12 October 2010

Recommendations in the Browne review on higher education fees and funding, released today, run the risk of restricting or downgrading study options for students, the higher education representative body GuildHE has warned.

Progressive proposals contained in a report on the review's conclusions, including more support for part-time students, more places on higher education courses, and higher repayment thresholds on student loans, are to be welcomed, said Andy Westwood, GuildHE's new chief executive.

But "several problems" may arise from the proposed system due to the way it has been inextricably linked to public funding cuts in higher education, due to be announced next week, he added.

"The report has recommended a system that will save public money in the forthcoming spending review, missing the original purpose of Lord Browne's review by some way.

"We simply cannot know the impact of the proposals on participation levels among students from poorer backgrounds, so we do not yet know whether they are fairer than the current system. In a few years we could be back where we started - needing a further review to assess the impact on widening access and on the world standing of our higher education sector.

"It is clear that many higher education institutions will not be able to charge £6,000 or more per year for their courses. This fact coupled with expected cuts in public funding for unprotected subjects potentially puts the offer of places and the student experience in jeopardy. In turn this could weaken the ability of the sector to drive economic growth in the short, medium and longer term."

Speaking on the Today Programme, Professor Ruth Farwell, GuildHE chair and vice-chancellor of Buckinghamshire New University, said: "We think it is regrettable that the review has been inextricably linked to funding cuts rather than thinking about how we create a world class HE system for the UK. The formula is one that is going to create a sector that has differential ability to create a quality experience for students."



Press releases, papers and documents published on this page are the intellectual property of an organisation unrelated to Central Lobby. We promote their parliamentary and political campaigning activities as they are subscribers to the Central Lobby service.

As such, Central Lobby does not edit, endorse, or attempt to balance the opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases and other such types of content are the responsibility of the originating organisation.

GuildHE

GuildHE

More from Dods

© Dods Parliamentary Communications Ltd