The Live Wire



Press Release

Freedom of Information Under Threat

19 March 2007

Which? has strongly criticised proposed changes to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) that would make it much harder for campaigning organisations to request information from government bodies.

The proposed changes are to be discussed at an oral session of the Department of Constitutional Affairs (DCA) Select Committee on Tuesday 20 March.

Government departments can already reject FOIA requests that cost more than £600 to investigate. Under the proposed changes, the time spent by civil servants reading, discussing and considering requests would be added to this cost. This means that complex FOIA requests could be dismissed solely on financial grounds, with no consideration of the public interest.

Some of the complex FOIA requests made by Which? in the past that would be rejected under the new rules include:

  • Restaurant inspection reports – “scores on doors”
  • EU subsidies paid to individual farmers
  • Enforcement policies of the Financial Services Authority
  • Details of the ministerial meetings with outside bodies

The proposed changes would also restrict organisations to making just one FOIA request per quarter.
Mark McLaren, public affairs campaigner, Which? says:
“Which? has found the Freedom of Information Act an extremely important tool in campaigning on a wide range of consumer issues.

“We are concerned that the new proposals will mean that any FOIA request that raises a new and complex issue for the first time is at risk of being refused without consideration of its merits. Such requests are by their nature time consuming at first because they challenge long held practices.

“Although the government claims that these proposals will save taxpayers money, the damage done to consumer rights by hindering organisations like Which? in this way will far outweigh any modest financial benefits.”



Press releases, papers and documents published on this page are the intellectual property of an organisation unrelated to Central Lobby. We promote their parliamentary and political campaigning activities as they are subscribers to the Central Lobby service.

As such, Central Lobby does not edit, endorse, or attempt to balance the opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases and other such types of content are the responsibility of the originating organisation.

Which?

Which?

More from Dods

© Dods Parliamentary Communications Ltd