Botched roadworks cost council taxpayers 70m pounds every year

20 April 2011

Contractors digging up roads on behalf of utility companies are failing to properly patch them up, leaving councils to foot the bill for £70 million worth of damage.

In England and Wales last year, workmen dug two million holes in the roads, leaving a trail of tailbacks and expensive repairs behind them. Some 360,000 were not completed to the agreed specification, with work either over-running, or roads not restored to their original condition.

The Local Government Association (LGA), which represents about 350 councils in England and Wales, is calling for councils to be given stronger powers to ensure roadworks are timed to cause the minimum disruption to motorists, and to guarantee roads are repaired properly once work has finished

Repairing damage wreaked on roads by utility companies costs council taxpayers an estimated £70 million per year, figures show.

Cllr Peter Box, Chairman of the LGA's Economy and Transport Board, said:

“Contractors should not be allowed to get away with botching road repairs and then leaving council tax payers to foot the bill.

“Roadworks are a pet hate of all motorists. Many would no doubt be surprised to learn that most road closures don't even result in the condition of roads improving and many actually make them worse.

“Councils face the joint challenge of managing the toughest spending cuts in living memory and tackling a £10.5 billion backlog in road maintenance

“It is only right that companies which drill and dig up our roads pay their fair share towards fixing the damage.”

The LGA is proposing utility companies pay a bond or deposit in advance of roadworks to make it easier for councils to recoup the cost of damage caused by inferior road repairs and encourage utilities to get it right first time.

Local authorities should also be able to reduce disruption for motorists by stipulating when, where and how often companies are allowed to dig up roads.

The LGA is calling for Government to scrap the unnecessary bureaucracy and red-tape which makes it difficult for local authorities to introduce permit schemes for regulating streetworks in their area.

Cllr Box added:

“Drivers are quite rightly fed up of being held up in miles of tailbacks while workmen take over roads for weeks on end. It's not unusual to see one utility company starting digging up a road again within weeks of another finishing there.

“Local authorities should be able to hold these firms to account and ensure that any routine maintenance work is co-ordinated. This will mean fewer holes in the roads and fewer unnecessary delays for motorists.”


Notes:

1 Two permit schemes are currently in operation, one in London and one in Kent. Kent County Council introduced a permit scheme in January 2010. The permits allow councils to impose conditions on street works like the times at which work must be completed. By co-ordinating contractors to work on sections of road at the same time, Kent County Council managed to save the equivalent of 240 days of road disruption in the three months from April to June 2010. For more details go to:

http://www.kent.gov.uk/roads_and_transport/highway_maintenance/kent_permit_scheme.aspx

2 Councils currently have to obtain permission from the Department for Transport to introduce a permit scheme in their area. The DfT has committed to removing this requirement by April 2012.

3 Figures published by the Asphalt Industry Alliance show there were 2 million road openings carried out by utility companies in 2010/11 and 18 per cent of those were not completed in accordance with specification. http://www.asphaltindustryalliance.com/images/library/files/ALARM_2011_WEB.pdf

---

Press releases, papers and documents published on this page are the intellectual property of an organisation unrelated to Central Lobby. We promote their parliamentary and political campaigning activities as they are subscribers to the Central Lobby service.

As such, Central Lobby does not edit, endorse, or attempt to balance the opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases and other such types of content are the responsibility of the originating organisation.