Economic advantages of wind farms- a total illusion


By Lord Thomas of Gresford
- 9th November 2011

Lord Thomas of Gresford outlines the potentially "devastating" impact of wind farms on the countryside of Mid Wales and Shropshire.

The KPMG report, 'Thinking About the Affordable', published this week, says that government plans for wind farms are too expensive and should be shelved in favour of cheaper nuclear and gas-fired power stations. Wind farms do not operate to full capacity for most of the time, by reason of the laws of nature.

In 2005, the Welsh Assembly Government issued TAN 8, the technical advice note meant to guide planning decisions. TAN 8 identified seven Strategic Search Areas as suitable for concentrated large-scale wind farm development, three of which were in Mid Wales. The focus is on Mid Wales because there are National Parks to north and south.

Schemes have been proposed in Montgomeryshire for 800 turbines, each up to 600ft tall, violating the uplands. Since there are no connections to the National Grid, these schemes require a network of electricity pylons, all running to a 28-acre substation, itself linked by a chain of 154 feet tall mega-pylons across into Shropshire, to a connection at Telford, some 45 miles away.

In response to proposals for building the pylons, put forward by Scottish Power and the National Grid, there have been protests throughout Mid Wales and Shropshire. All local authorities have been unanimous in their condemnation. In May, the biggest protest demonstration in the Welsh Assembly's history took place in Cardiff. Carwyn Jones, the Welsh First Minister, realised finally what had been let loose and, in a reversal of previous policy, said on 17th June: "The Welsh Government believes this level of development is unacceptable in view of its wider impacts on the local area." But the hot potato has now been handed on to Westminster.

What is the government's reaction? Surely DECC will not ride roughshod over the united communities of Montgomeryshire, Shropshire and beyond? Which actual government minister will sign off approvals of these applications? Who will balance the antagonism of local people, the expressed hostility of their representatives, the obvious environmental considerations, the impact upon tourism and the local economy, against the expensive and limited capacity for generating electricity that these wind farms possess?

The impact on the people and the beautiful countryside of Mid Wales and Shropshire will be devastating. 800 of these structures in the area proposed is completely and wholly out of proportion. If localism means anything at all, the ruination of the hills should be taken by bodies accountable locally. The macro-economic alleged advantages are, as KPMG point out, a total illusion.

Lord Thomas of Gresfordis a former Deputy High Court Judge and Liberal candidate for West Flintshire and Wrexham. He was raised to the peerage in 1996.

Bookmark and Share

Article Comments

Well, the alternative - as outlined in the KPMG report - are nuclear power plants. They only need about 100,000 to 200,000 m2 area and high voltage lines, which has the same dimension than the one for the wind farms.

NIMBY
10th Nov 2011 at 3:04 pm

There is absolutely no political "morals or honesty" when it comes to planting these monstrosities on valuable rural lands! It is all about money and how much can be "swindled" from the taxpayers' pockets by a disgraceful and bordering on the criminal, Green Industry.

Politicians have been "bought off" and are promised a cushy retirement if they act like "good little toady" in selling out their own electorate!

The only "economic advantage" of a Wind Development starts and stops right in the wallets of the Wind Companies and Politicians who support them.

thebiggreenlie
10th Nov 2011 at 12:01 am

As resident of Powys (650m from proposed wind farm recently approved by Herefordshire in spite of Powys' strong objection) I heartily agree. Neither UK, Welsh or Scottish governments seem to have absorbed the well-publicised facts about the technical consequences of the variability of wind and therefore the futility of ruining our countryside. We continue to hear how many homes might be supplied when the truth is no UK wind power can reliably supply any home. When will they ever learn?

Dr Christine Hugh-Jones
9th Nov 2011 at 11:45 am

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

Coaltion energy policy 'not credible'

'Step change needed' to cut carbon emissions

Miliband: Tory councils are blocking wind farms

Energy policy faces criticism

Gordon Banks MP: Getting the right energy mix



Latest news

Public 'should discipline MPs'

The procedure committee has called for two lay members to be appointed to the committee on standards.


Coalition 'damaging prospects for children in poverty'

Cathy Jamieson MP outlines her views on the findings of Action for Children's "The Red Book".


The Red Book: Addressing the false economy

Vulnerable people are already paying the human cost of decisions made in the first year since the spending review, according to research conducted by Action for Children.


Speaker attacks Commons security


Polished James faces the music


Murdoch rejects 'Mafia' claim


Government must 'champion' good management


Select committees 'may need more powers'


More from Dods