The Live Wire

Clarke to reform 'no win no fee' cases

Bookmark and Share

Member News

29th March 2011

The justice secretary has announced major changes to the civil justice system and reform of 'no win no fee' deals.

Ken Clarke told the House of Commons we now have a situation where many defendants settle out of court, even when they have a strong case, in order to avoid huge legal costs.

He plans to abolish recoverability of success fees and associated costs in 'no win no fee' conditional fee agreements.

Under the current regime, defendants must pay these additional costs if they lose.

Instead, claimants will have to pay their lawyer's success fee and will therefore take an interest in controlling the costs being incurred on their behalf.

Clarke said the government wants to encourage the use of damages-based agreements in litigation before the courts.

These are another form of 'no win no fee' agreement, under which lawyers can take a proportion of the claimants' damages in fees.

Clarke said he will seek legislation to restore the fundamental values of civil justice and attacked a system where legal costs often outstrip compensation payments.

He called the current situation "unparalled in any other country".

"We plan to end the recoverability of success fees and insurance premiums, which drive legal costs, award claimants a 10 per cent uplift in general damages where they have suffered loss, and then ensure that they take an interest in controlling the bills being run up on their behalf by expecting them to pay their own lawyer's success fee," he said.

Shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan said it is difficult to disagree with reforming civil justice, a process that the last Labour government began.

He said that while he accepts the costs of civil cases should be reformed, all people should have recourse to the civil courts.

He said that the poor already have trouble finding a lawyer to act on their behalf and these changes may exacerbate that situation.

"There is a fear that these plans go so far in trying to keep down costs that some claimants with meritorious cases would find it difficult, if not impossible, to find a lawyer to take on their case," he said.

Clarke said any effect on insurance premiums is a matter for that industry, but said costs could well have been driven up by 'no win no fee' cases.

Former justice secretary Jack Straw welcomed the changes, and called for claims companies that advertise for clients and then sell on bundles of cases to solicitors to be shut down.

Clarke said his reforms should result in fewer "purely speculative cases" and an unacceptable compensation culture has developed.

Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid, Dwyfor Meirionnydd) expressed concern that access to justice for the poorest will be affected, and the only beneficiaries will be insurance companies.

There will be a consultation on other plans to improve how court judgments are enforced, so that people receive what it is judged they are owed, as well as introducing automatic referral to mediation in small claims cases, or mediation awareness sessions in higher-value cases, to help people avoid court where possible.

Clarke wants to raise the small claims limit and to change the county court jurisdiction so that the High Court is used for bigger and more complex claims only.

Bookmark and Share

Article Comments

The Ministry of Justice is about to implement a devastating attack on access to justice in the mistaken belief that ordinary people will be able to stick up for themselves against local and central government, the medical profession, landlords, big business and other authorities.

Taken together with the Government's legal aid reforms, these plans on civil costs funding mean that ordinary people won't be able to obtain proper redress for the wrongs they have suffered.

Law Society president, Linda Lee
30th Mar 2011 at 1:23 pm

We are delighted by the Minister's announcement that the Government intends to implement the recommendations made by Lord Justice Jackson in his report on civil legal costs. The reforms will address the excessive and very often disproportionate costs claimed under 'no win no fee' agreements, while ensuring patients can still seek compensation if they have been negligently harmed. The current situation under which costs can far exceed the compensation awarded to the damaged patient could not be allowed to continue.

Sharmala Moodley, deputy head of claims at the Medical Defence Union (MDU)
30th Mar 2011 at 1:21 pm

I have two arguments in this country. One is law and how inaccessible it is for people on low incomes. I believe that every person has a right to legal representation. So many companies threaten people with legal action knowing that they could not afford a lawyer and thus get away with scare tactics. I hope that Ken Clarke leaves all people to have an equivalent of a no win no fee basis for business. I would guess that Mr Clarke will give careful consideration to this knowing the sort of fair man that I know him to be.

My second grip will have to wait for an appropriate lead. That is the extortionate prices that Veterinary Surgeons charge for a simple procedure and worse for their medication. I'll leave that one for now.

Gerald Phillips
29th Mar 2011 at 6:09 pm





More from Dods