The Live Wire

Aid to be diverted to 'worlds poorest'

Bookmark and Share

Member News

2nd July 2010

International development aid will be diverted towards the worlds poorest, Andrew Mitchell said in a debate on global poverty yesterday.

Following on from last week’s Budget announcement that overseas aid spending would be ring fenced, the international development secretary said that there would be a further drive to stamp out inefficiencies by reallocating funding from low priority or underperforming programmes to those more focused on eradicating poverty.

Speaking in the Commons yesterday afternoon he said: "I expect shortly to be able to announce that more than £100 million will be saved from projects that are a low priority or not performing.

"That money will be reallocated to programmes that are more effective in helping the world's poorest people."

Mitchell said that public support for overseas funding would not be maintained unless value for money could be demonstrated.

"Hard-pressed taxpayers need to know that the expenditure of their money is being scrutinised fully and is really delivering results.

We are therefore working to develop an independent aid watchdog, as we consistently promised throughout the past four years, to evaluate the effectiveness of DfID's spending. I expect to report to the House shortly on both of those initiatives."

In addition to the setting up of the independent aid watch dog, Mitchell said that there would be modifications to the way aid programmes were set up, so that there was a greater emphasis on impact and effectiveness from the start.

He said that "well spent aid has achieved miracles around the world." and that tackling the root causes of poverty was "very much in our interest."

"Whether the issue is drug-resistant diseases, economic stability, conflict and insecurity, climate change or migration, it is far more effective to tackle the root cause now than to treat the symptoms later."

He also outlined that the particular attention would be paid to the fight against Malaria in every country in which the department was active.
Reducing the burden of Malaria in the developing world and focusing on the areas of highest infection will be an essential part of our programmes.

He also said that access to and provision of family planning services and contraception would be a key priority for DfID.

But shadow development secretary, Douglas Alexander said the Coalition government’s programme lacked vision and ambition.

He said that aid spending should be administered alongside wider discussions about reforming the global architecture.

"I believe it is vital that the G20 discusses the wider global economic architecture, that the concerns of the poorest countries are at the forefront and that issues such as taxation and the regulation and taxation of the financial markets are treated as development issues, in the way we sought to do at the London G20 summit."

Alexander said it was important that "additional climate finance" be made available to help developing countries combat climate change.

Bookmark and Share

Article Comments

What about diverting money to some of the World's poorest - Britain's own state pensioners living in certain countries (but not all countries) around the world.

Pensioners living in almost all Commonwealth countries have their state pensions frozen at the rate at which it is first paid or as at the date of migration.

Pensioners living in favoured countries like the USA, Israel, Switzerland, Turkey, the countries of the former Yugoslavia, Jamaica, Bermuda, Barbados and all the EU countries have their pensions uprated each year just as if they lived in the UK.

Many frozen pensioners have either returned to the UK or are considering returning because their state pension will again be uprated to its normal level if they return. Of course, they bring back their demands on the NHS, social services and housing as well, which will cost British taxpayers.

It is estimated that it would cost around £1,000 per frozen pensioner per year to uprate them all but the savings to the NHS and all exceed £5,000 per pensioner per year.

It makes economic sense to encourage pensioners to migrate through paying them uprated pensions and it would help keep them overseas where their health, social services and housing costs are not met by the British taxpayer.

Peter Morris
5th Jul 2010 at 8:13 am



More from Dods