Sir Patrick Cormack FSA
Question on Home Affairs and Justice
Sir Patrick Cormack (South Staffordshire) (Con): For wholly different reasons, I endorse the request by the hon. Member for Rhondda (Chris Bryant). Does the Lord High Chancellor accept that more Conservative Members have voted against an all-elected or 80 per cent. elected House than have voted for it; and will he therefore include at least one representative from the majority opinion on the Conservative Benches in his talks?
Sir George Young (North-West Hampshire) (Con) rose—
Mr. Straw: I think that the right hon. Gentleman may have the answer, so I shall give way.
Sir George Young: A majority of Conservative MPs voted for one of the two elected options.
Mr. Straw: I knew that the right hon. Gentleman would have the answer; he is a very wise and sage man. That merely illustrates—I say this with great respect to the hon. Member for South Staffordshire (Sir Patrick Cormack)—that it would be impossible to have constructive all-party talks if all shades of opinion across the spectrum were contained within them; we would never agree about anything. The truth is that the formal position of all three parties, as expressed in their manifestos and in the House, is in favour of a wholly or mainly elected second chamber. I know that the hon. Gentleman disagrees.
Sir Patrick Cormack rose—
Mr. Straw: I am afraid that the hon. Gentleman must excuse me, as I have to make some progress.
Latest Press Releases
- Question on List Places of Worship
- South Staffordshire Conservative Association
- SENIOR TORY REJECTED BY CONSTITUENCY PARTY
- Campaign for an Effective Second Chamber
- Question on NHS Finance
- Question on Supermarkets
- Intervention during the debate on the Northern Ireland Bill
- Speech during the Northern Ireland Bill Debate
- Question to Foreign Secretary on when he last met the Zimbabwean president
- Staffordshire Newsletter

