Westminster Scotland Wales Northern Ireland London European Union Local


[Advanced Search]
It's time we had more quality homes for rent
Clive Betts MP

We've heard a lot recently about the plight of the first time buyer. Over the past week, major banks and building societies have announced that borrowers without a 25 per cent deposit will be excluded from the best mortgage deals.

And according to a new study by Abbey, almost two-thirds of those aiming to becoming first time buyers at the beginning of the year have decided they are not looking for a mortgage after all.

Home ownership will always be an attractive prospect, but it's not the right move for everyone. Renting a home is often seen as a poor alternative. But it doesn't have to be this way – it's actually a positive lifestyle choice in other European countries. It's interesting to note that the UK's homeownership rate is around 70 per cent, compared to 43 per cent in Germany and 63 per cent in France.

The
All Party Urban Development Group (which I chair) has a new report out on affordable homes. Our report points out that the target of 3 million homes by 2020 is under threat, unless private sector investors such as pension funds and insurance companies are encouraged to invest in building and managing good quality homes for rent.

Common in Germany, Switzerland and the US, these housing developments, funded by private investors and maintained by responsible management companies provide good quality accommodation which people actually choose to rent rather than buy.

Large companies already invest in commercial property in the UK. Now more needs to be done to encourage large companies to invest in rental housing for the long-term. We have 3 million new homes to build and private house building, social homes and ad hoc buy-to-let won't make up the shortfall, though we need to see changes in approach to ensure they play their part as well.

The
All Party Urban Development Group is hoping to feed in to the Government’s review into the private rented sector. The Government should take action to remove the barriers to long-term investment in private rented housing – whether through real estate investment trusts (REITs) or other mechanisms.

If these property developments are to be a genuine alternative in our 'homeownership at all costs' culture, we'll need to see long term investment in a 'quality product'. This means good management of new and existing homes – so people feel the benefits of 'hassle free' renting over home ownership.

It means the possibility of longer tenancy periods to encourage a wider range of tenants. It also means a good mix of dwellings, rather than just one and two bed flats – and a better balance between owner-occupied, social rented and private rented housing.

With the housing market and delivery of the government's house-building target looking more uncertain, it's clear that home ownership is not necessarily the right thing for everyone at the present time. Now is the time to make renting a more attractive alternative.

The
All Party Parliamentary Urban Development Group (APUDG) is a cross-party parliamentary body of MPs and Peers committed to progressing urban renewal and sustainable development in the UK. The Centre for Cities and British Property Federation provide secretariat services for the group.



Blog Comments


Clive's right - we all need to be less obsessed with home ownership, and a bigger private rented sector is essential in these uncertain times for the housing market. Bob Kerslake and the new Homes and Communities Agency, take note... http://centreforcities.typepad.com/centre_for_cities/

Dermot Finch
London
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:19:16 GMT+00

Government should take private rented landlords more seriously. For instance, 1000's of properties are in the ownership of landlords who would rather sell them yet are punitively taxed and no allowance is made for re-investment of the proceeds. Previous Chancellor dropped plans to allow rented properties to be part of pension schemes. I feel that this would have led to an expansion of the sector, a raising of standards and more completition. Clearly it would also have led to considerable economic activity. Instead, taxpayers money being thrown at housing associations...

Matthew Sands
East Midlands
Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:06:35 GMT+00

Published: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 00:01:00 GMT+00

Submit Comment

Name
Email
Location
Comment
Remember Me